Safe by design.
The clinician stays in control of every word.
aurii drafts; it never decides. Every note, letter, discharge summary and billing item is reviewed, edited and signed by a named specialist before it goes anywhere. Nothing is issued automatically. That separation — aurii drafts, the clinician signs — is the foundation everything else on this page is built on.
The clinician always signs.
aurii separates drafting from signing on purpose. The draft is a starting point; the signature is the decision — and only a person makes it.
Drafting and signing are two different things
A draft is a convenience. A signature is a clinical decision. aurii keeps them apart so the decision always belongs to a person.
- Every document, every time. Notes, GP and referrer letters, discharge summaries and billing items all pass through the same review-then-sign step.
- A named specialist, not "the system". The signature carries a real clinician's name, and that clinician stays responsible for the clinical content.
- Nothing is issued automatically. aurii will not send, file or bill on its own. No signature, no delivery — there is no path around it.
- The edits are the truth. Whatever the clinician changes becomes the record. The draft never overrides the person.
Designed around RACGP guidance.
The RACGP has published guidance on AI scribes. We designed aurii around it — and we say plainly that we are not endorsed by them.
The clinician reviews and signs the note
The RACGP's central point on AI scribes is that the clinician remains responsible: the AI assists with documentation, and the clinician checks and approves what it produces. That is exactly the line aurii is built around — drafting is the AI's job, the note is the clinician's.
- The clinician reviews every draft before it counts
- The clinician edits anything that isn't right
- The clinician signs, and remains accountable for the content
Aligned with the guidance, not endorsed by the RACGP
"Aligned with" means we designed aurii to fit the way the RACGP describes safe use of an AI scribe. It does not mean the RACGP has reviewed, approved or endorsed aurii — they have not, and we will never claim they have.
The same goes for consent and disclosure: AI-scribe use should be explained to the patient and consented to. aurii supports that practice; the conversation stays between clinician and patient.
Not a medical device.
aurii is a documentation tool. It writes down what happened; it does not make clinical judgements about what should happen next.
- Diagnose, or suggest a diagnosis
- Triage, or rank clinical urgency
- Flag, interpret or alert on results
- Recommend treatment or medication
- Make, or act on, any clinical decision
- Draft the note from what you say at the bedside
- Draft GP and referrer letters and discharge summaries
- Capture the billing items the clinician confirms
- Present it all for the clinician to review and sign
- Keep a tamper-evident record of every step
Because aurii does not diagnose, triage or make clinical decisions, it sits outside the TGA's definition of a regulated medical device. The clinician's judgement, review and signature provide the clinical decision-making — aurii only documents it. TGA guidance on clinical decision support software
How we keep drafting reliable.
We won't quote an accuracy figure — drafting quality depends on the consult, and a single number would hide more than it tells. Here is the mechanism instead, honestly.
Clinician review is the safety net
The single most reliable check on any draft is the clinician reading it. aurii is designed so review is unavoidable, not optional — the draft cannot become a record without it. A wrong draft that is corrected and signed is a correct record.
Structured templates per document type
A progress note, a GP letter, a discharge summary and a billing item each have their own structure. Drafting to a defined template per document type keeps the output predictable and easy to scan, so a missing or out-of-place detail stands out to the clinician reviewing it.
A tamper-evident audit of every action
Drafted, edited, reviewed, signed, issued — every action and every actor is written to an append-only, hash-chained record. If a note is ever questioned, you can re-compute the chain and show exactly what was drafted, what the clinician changed, and who signed.
The clinician's edits are the ground truth
When a clinician corrects a draft, the corrected version is what counts and what is recorded. aurii never overrides an edit or "puts back" its own wording. The person always has the last word, on every line.
Built on a transcript you can check
aurii drafts from the consult it captured, not from memory. The clinician can compare the draft against what was said and confirm it reflects the consult before signing — the source is right there to check.
Honest about the limits
AI drafting can mishear, miss nuance or phrase something awkwardly. We don't pretend otherwise — which is exactly why the clinician's review and signature are required, not advisory. The safety comes from the process, not from a claim of perfect drafting.
Clinical safety and data safety go together
Safe documentation also means safe handling. Your clinical data lives in Australia, is encrypted record by record, isolated to your practice, and every action is written to a tamper-evident audit you can verify. The full picture is set out on our security and trust pages.
The doctor decides.
aurii does the writing.
Bring the safety questions your clinical governance team will ask. We built aurii so the answer is always the same: a named clinician reviews and signs.
hello@aurii.com.au · SYD primary // MEL backup // always doctor-signed